PENGARUH PEMBELAJARAN PROJECT BASED LEARNING BERINTEGRASIKAN SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS (STEM) TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR GEOGRAFI DI SMA NEGERI 1 GORONTALO

Novia Ayu Lestari; Sunarty Suly Eraku; Rusiyah Rusiyah

doi:10.34312/jgej.v2i2.11587

PENGARUH PEMBELAJARAN PROJECT BASED LEARNING BERINTEGRASIKAN SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND MATHEMATICS (STEM) TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR GEOGRAFI DI SMA NEGERI 1 GORONTALO

Novia Ayu Lestari, Sunarty Suly Eraku, Rusiyah Rusiyah

Abstract

The influence of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) Integrend Learnig Process on the Learning Outcomes of 1 th Grade Student (An Experimental Research Implementend in SMA 1 State Senior High School if Gorontalo). This study aimed to determine the differences in learning outcomes of student with the implementation of the Ppa-STEM learning model whilw the control class implemented the learning cycle (5E) learning model on the topic of “population planning and Development Dynamis in Indonesia”. To achieve these objecives, this research employed experimental design with post-test Control Group Design. Data collection techniques involved learning result test, which was provided towards the sample of research. The sample of the study consisted of two classes; class XIb3 of social science as the control class employed the learning cycle (5E) model. During the hypothesis testing, the homogeneity and normality test of the data was conducted in order to conduct hypothesis testing by using parametric statistics. The data normality test employed a chi-square statistical test of the pair of null hypothesis H_o and its match H_i with α = 0,05 significal rate. The test result showed that χ²_count less than χ²_table for the experimental class with 3,449 less than 11,070 and the control class of 1,023 less then is 9,488. The result revealed that the two data classes can be normally distributed. Based on the results of normality test data, the average score pg students learning outcomes used the statistical test. The hypothesis test results obtained t_count greater than t_table which was 6,58 greater than 2,02. All in all, the results revealed that there were differences in the learning outcomes of students who used the two aforeentioned learning models.

Keywords

Learning Outcomes; Project Based Learning; STEM;

Full Text:

PDF

References

Afriana, J., Permanasari, A., & Fitriani, A. (2016). Penerapan project based learning terintegrasi STEM untuk meningkatkan literasi sains siswa ditinjau dari gender. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 2(2), 202–212.

Anwari, I., Yamada, S., Unno, M., Saito, T., Suwarma, I., Mutakinati, L., & Kumano, Y. (2015). Implementation of Authentic Learning and Assessment through STEM Education Approach to Improve Students’ Metacognitive Skills. K-12 STEM Education, 1(3), 123–136.

Asmani, & Ma’mur, J. (2012). 7 Tips Aplikasi PAKEM (Pembelajaran Aktif, kreatif, Efektif, Dan Menyenangkan). Jogjakarta: DIVA Press.

Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M., & Morgan, J. (2013). STEM Project-Based Learning: An Integrated Science, Tchnology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Approach. Rotterdam: Sense Publisher.

Depdiknas. (2006). Bunga Rampai Keberhasilan Guru dalam Pembelajaran (SMA, SMK, dan SLB). Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Dewi, H. R. (2017). Peningkatan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Melalui Penerapan Inkuiri Terbimbing Berbasis STEM. In Prosiding SNPF (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fisika) (hal. 47–53).

Fernandes, S., Mesquita, D., & Flores, M. A. (2014). Engaging students in learning: Findings from a studi of project-led education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 39(1), 55–67.

LaForce, M., Noble, E., & Blackwell, C. (2017). Problem-based learning (PBL) and student interest in STEM careers: The roles of motivation and ability beliefs. Education Sciences, 7(4), 92.

Mulyono, N. (2016). Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: Rizki Press.

Oey, M., Rahayu, S. I., Amin, M., Effendi, S., Darma, Y., Dartanto, T., & Aruan, C. D. (2017). Era disrupsi peluang dan tantangan pendidikan tinggi Indonesia. Jakarta: Akademi Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia.

Otoluwa, Y., Eraku, S., & Yusuf, D. (2019). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Lectora Inspire Yang Diintegrasikan Dengan Camtasia Studio Pada Mata Pelajaran Geografi Materi Sistem Informasi Geografi. JAMBURA GEO EDUCATION JOURNAL, 1(1), 01–08. https://doi.org/10.34312/jgej.v1i1.4041

Perignat, E., & Katz-Buonincontro, J. (2019). STEAM in practice and research: An integrative literature review. Thinking skills and creativity, 31, 31–43.

Redkar, S. (2012). Teaching Advanced Vehicle Dynamics Using a Project Based Learning (PBL) Approach. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, 13(3).

Stohlmann, M., Moore, T. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2012). Considerations for Teaching Integrated STEM Education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 2(1), 28–34.

Suwarma, I., Puji, A., & Endah, N. (2015). Ballon Powered Car “sebagai media pembelajaran IPA berbasis STEM (Science Technology Engineering Mathematic). In Prosinding Simposium Naisonal Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Sains. Bandung.

Tirtaharja, U., & Sulo, S. (2005). Pengantar Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

White, D. (2014). What is STEM education and why is it important. Florida Association of Teacher Educators Journal, 1(14), 1–9.

Widayanti, Abudurrahman, & Suyatna, A. (2019). Future Physics Learning Materials Based on STEM Education: Analysis of Teachers and Students Perceptions. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 115). IOP Publisher.

Yustyan, S., Widodo, N., & Pantiwati, Y. (2015). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis dengan pembelajaran berbasis scientific approach siswa kelas X SMA Panjura Malang. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 1(2).

Zubaidah, S. (2019). STEM (Science, technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathemtics): Pembelajaran untuk Memperdayakan Keterampilan Abad ke-21. In Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Sains (hal. 1–18).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34312/jgej.v2i2.11587