Keterkaitan Jarak Geografis Terhadap Eksistensi Tradisi Pantauan Bunting (Konstruksi Sosial Suku Besemah, Lahat, Indonesia)

Novia Fitri Istiawati, Miranda Agustin Lestari, Sugeng Widodo

Abstract


This study aims to look at the backwardness of the region and the socio-cultural construction of the Besemah Pantauan Bunting tradition by revealing: 1) the process of the birth of the tradition, 2) the factors causing differences in the distribution of traditions in each region, and 3) existence in the tracking era of the Besemah Tribe. The research was conducted in Lahat District, South Sumatra using an interpretive paradigm, qualitative research types, and ethnographic methods. Data was obtained from primary and secondary sources. Data collection techniques were carried out through non-participant observation, interviews, documentation, and purposive sampling techniques. Data analysis was carried out through open coding, axial coding, and selective coding. In contrast, data analysis was carried out through continuous observation, triangulation, member checks, peer reviews, and reference adequacy checks. Based on the results of the study with Berger's social construction theory, social construction is formed through 3 (three) dialectical processes namely, the first externalization of the existence of Pantauan Bunting as part of the Besemah Tribe marriage which is intended to introduce the bride and groom to relatives and family so that a harmonious relationship is established in the period after marriage. Second, the process of objectivation through the implementing regulations for the Pantauan Bunting tradition succeeded in legitimizing the existence of this tradition in society. Third, the process of internalization through primary socialization by using customary institutions to move the community to be aware of their ancestral heritage so that they continue the tradition. The distribution of the Pantauan Bunting tradition varies in each region due to geographical and social factors. Even though it has entered the modern era, the existence of this tradition is still maintained by the Besemah people and we can still find it in various areas in Lahat Regency.


Keywords


Social Construction; Pregnancy monitoring; Besemah Tribe

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams-Hutcheson G (2019) Farming in the troposphere: Drawing together affective atmospheres and elemental geographies. Social and Cultural Geography 20(7): 1004–1023.

Alexander, J. C. (2008). Iconic consciousness: The material feeling of meaning. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(5), 782-794.

Andrei O. J. Kwok & Sharon G. M. Koh (2021) Deepfake: a social construction of technology perspective, Current Issues in Tourism, 24:13, 1798-1802, DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2020.1738357

Anu, Karolina Susana Afra. 2022. “Kajian Geografi Budaya terhadap Tradisi Keo Rado Masyarakat Adat Tololela di Desa Manubara Kecamatan Inerie Kabupaten Ngada”. Skripsi. Kupang: Undana.

Cook, Ian. 2020. Ethnography in Human Geography. Online: Sage Publications Ltd, https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036861343

Arios, R. L. Pertukaran Sosial dalam Tradisi Pantawan Bunting pada Suku Bangsa Besemah di Kota Pagaralam Provinsi Sumatera Selatan. Patanjala, Vol. 11 No. 3.

Ba’, S. (2021). The critique of Sociology of Childhood: Human capital as the concrete ‘social construction of childhood.’ Power and Education, 13(2), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/17577438211011637

Badan Pusat Statistik. 2018. Survei Demografi dan Kesehatan Indonesia Tahun 2018. Online: https://www.bps.go.id/statictable/2020/10/21/2111/laporan-survei-demografi-dan-kesehatan-indonesia.html

Badan Pusat Statistik. 2021. Kabupaten Lahat Dalam Angka. Online: https://lahatkab.bps.go.id/

Berger, Peter L. & Thomas Luckmann 1990. Tafsir Sosial atas Kenyataan: Risalah tentang Sosiologi Pengetahuan (diterjemahkan dari buku asli The Social Construction of Reality oleh Hasan Basari). Jakarta: LP3ES

Burr, V. (2015). Social constructionism. Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Reseach Design; Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Dariyatno, T. (2009). Handbook of Qualitative Research. (Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln, Eds.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Diaz-Leon, E. (2015), What Is Social Construction?. Eur J Philos, 23: 1137-1152. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12033

Dove, G. (2009). Beyond perceptual symbols: A call for representational pluralism. Cognition, 110(3), 412-431.

Gerber, Rod and Williams, Michael. 2002. Geography, Culture, and Education. United Kingdom: Springer Publication

Gergen, K.J. (2005). Social Construction in Context. Sage Publications

Hitchings, R., & Latham, A. (2020). Qualitative methods II: On the presentation of ‘geographical ethnography.’ Progress in Human Geography, 44(5), 972–980. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519879986

Hjelm, T. (2019). Rethinking the theoretical base of Peter L. Berger’s sociology of religion: Social construction, power, and discourse. Critical Research on Religion, 7(3), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050303219874392

John, Deborah Roedder. 1999. Consumer Socialization Of Children: A Retrospective Look at Twenty-Five Years of Research. Journal of Consumer Research. Vol. 26, Issue. 3 December. (Online): https://doi.org/10.1086/209559

Jumhari dan Hariadi. 2014. Identitas Kultural Orang Besemah di Kota Pagaralam. Jakarta: CV. Talao Sumber Rezeki

Hammersley, Martyn & Atkinson, Paul. 2019. Ethnography Principles in Practice. London: Routledge

Herbert, Steve. 2000. For Ethnography. Progress in Human Geography 24,4 (2000) pp. 550–568. Online: http://phg.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/24/4/550

Kardiyan. 2015. Setengah Abad Amalgamasi Antara Etnis Jawa dengan Etnis Tempatan di Desa Siabu Kecamatan Salo Kabupaten Kampar. Jom FISIP. Vol. 2 No.2.

Khalidi, M. A. (2015). Three kinds of social kinds. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 90(1), 96-112.

Lestari, Puji., Setiawan, Aldi., Puspitaningrum, Anggriyani. 2018. Urgensi Habituasi Nilai Karakter Kemandirian Dan Tanggung Jawab Peserta Didik Sekolah Menengah Keguruan. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial, Vol 4, No 2, pp. 114-119 P-ISSN: 2407-4551. Online: https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JIIS/index

Ley, D. 1988. Interpretive Social Research in The Inner City. In Eyles, J., editor, Research in Human Geography, Oxford: Blackwell, p. 121-138

Lusiani, Nyoman. 2015. “Pudarnya Pernikahan Ngerorod pada Masyarakat Bali Desa Tri Mulyo Kabupaten Lampung Tengah”. Bandar Lampung: Universitas Lampung

Matthews, M. (2019), Agency and Social Construction: Practice of the Self in Art and Design. Int J Art Des Educ, 38: 18-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12186

Moleong, Lexy, J. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Rosda

Noella J. Gray, Catherine Corson, Lisa M. Campbell, Peter R. Wilshusen, Rebecca L. Gruby & Shannon Hagerman (2020) Doing Strong Collaborative Fieldwork in Human Geography, Geographical Review, 110:1-2, 117-132, DOI: 10.1111/gere.12352

Ondiba, H. A., & Matsui, K. (2019). Social attributes and factors influencing entrepreneurial behaviors among rural women in Kakamega County, Kenya. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40497-018-0123-5

Refisrul, N. 2019. Fungsi Lemang dalam Upacara Perkawinan Suku Besemah di Kabupaten Kaur Provinsi Bengkulu. Jurnal Penelitian Sejarah Dan Budaya, Vol. 5 No.2.

Sandu, A., & Nistor, P. (2020). Individual versus Social in Psycho-Sociology. The Social Construction of Reality. Moldavian Journal for Education and Social Psychology, 4(2), 44-49. https://doi.org/10.18662/mjesp/4.2/21

Sari, P. I., M. Syawaludin dan S. Khudin. 2021. Tradisi Dalam Perkawinan Masyarakat Desa Sukarami Pagaralam. Tanjak: Sejarah Dan Peradaban Islam, Vol.1 No. 2.

Scott, John. 2012. Teori Sosial: Masalah-masalah Pokok dalam Sosiologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Shaffer, J. D. (2021). Knowledge, boundaries, and bodies: Social construction between medical sociology and science and technology studies. Sociology Compass, e12924. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12924

Siburian, Robert. 2008. Masyarakat Indonesia: Majalah Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Indonesia. Jakarta: Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia, Jilid XXXIV, No. 1, 2008. ISSN: 0125-9989, Hal: 63-86

Sulistiyo, A. B. (2007). Memahami Paradigma Interpretivisme, Kritisisme Dan Postmodernisme Dalam Penelitian Sosial Dan Akuntansi. Retrieved March 28, 2019, from file://localhost/h:/non POS/Agung Budi Sulistiyo.htm

Viani, Desta. 2019. “Peran K. H Sayyid Umar Bin H. Mesagus Abdurrahman dalam Perkembangan Islam di Desa Pagaruyung Kecamatan Kota Agung Kabupaten Lahat (1905-1969 M/1322-1388 H)”. Palembang: UIN Raden Fatah

Yin, Robert K. 2013. Studi Kasus Desain & Metode. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Yulistiana, T. (2013). Pengaruh Modernisasi Terhadap Perubahan Pemaknaan Tradisi Lokal Jawa Mendhem Ari-Ari. Skripsi . Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.34312/jgej.v4i1.17355

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Authors

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

                                 JournalStories Main logo s
aya: