Jojokh as a Socio-Spatial Practice in the Coastal Wedding Tradition of Lampung, Indonesia

Novia Fitri Istiawati, Khoirun Najmi Septiana, Rahma Kurnia Sri Utami, Meri Herlina, Dian Utami

Abstract


Across Lampung’s coastal settlements, Jojokh remains central to customary marriage, yet its meaning is being renegotiated amid modernization, gender equality debates, and digital connectivity. This study investigates how space, place, and generational change shape the continuity and transformation of Jojokh in contemporary coastal Lampung. A qualitative ethnographic case study was conducted in Pesisir Barat, Tanggamus, and South Lampung from February to November 2025. Data were gathered through participant observation, in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, and document analysis involving forty-six customary leaders, parents, millennials, and scholars. The data were examined thematically and spatially, while triangulation and member checking strengthened credibility. Findings reveal that Jojokh values vary according to proximity to historic maritime trade routes and levels of urbanization, suggesting a qualitative association between coastal setting and cultural practice. Jojokh also persists as a marker of Saibatin identity through selective adaptation, including its negotiation in social media spaces. Rather than rejecting the tradition, millennials act as cultural modifiers who balance economic realities, gender equity, and ancestral belonging. The study demonstrates that customary marriage payments are neither static nor simply declining. It contributes a spatial and intergenerational perspective to cultural geography and offers a basis for participatory, adaptive, and sustainable cultural preservation policies.


Keywords


Cultural geography; Customary marriage; Generational change; Jojokh; Marriage payments; Saibatin identity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmed, S. K. (2024). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 2, Article 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100051

Ash-Shabah, M. A., Nahrowi, & Masyrofah. (2021). Dowry amount in Aceh-Indonesia and Selangor-Malaysia: Between state regulations and customs. AHKAM: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 21(2), 325–356. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v21i2.19673

Aşur, F., Akpinar Kulekci, E., & Perihan, M. (2022). The role of urban landscapes in the formation of urban identity and urban memory relations: the case of Van/Turkey. Planning Perspectives, 37(4), 841–857. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2022.2090418

Baharuddin, Malik, A., & Rizqullah, R. (2025). The sociology of gender roles in traditional and modern Bugis families. Journal Social Humanity Perspective, 3(2), 102–113. https://doi.org/10.71435/661335

Banarjee, S., & Sikder, M. R. (2026). Lived experiences of domestic violence survivors in Bangladesh: A socio-cultural examination. International Criminology, 6(2), 252–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43576-026-00209-4

Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Doubleday.

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1972). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2024). Supporting best practice in reflexive thematic analysis reporting in Palliative Medicine: A review of published research and introduction to the Reflexive Thematic Analysis Reporting Guidelines (RTARG). Palliative Medicine, 38(6), 608–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241234800

Busyro, Burhanuddin, N., Muassomah, Saka, P. A., & Wafa, M. A. (2023). The reinforcement of the “dowry for groom” tradition in customary marriages of West Sumatra’s Pariaman society. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam, 7(1), 555–578. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i1.15872

Chiplunkar, G., & Weaver, J. (2023). Marriage markets and the rise of dowry in India. Journal of Development Economics, 164, Article 103115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2023.103115

Eisenstadt, S. N. (2000). Multiple modernities. Daedalus, 129(1), 1–29. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20027613

Elledge, A. M. (2022). Insights from feminist geography: Positionality, knowledge production, and difference. Journal of the Bulgarian Geographical Society, 46, 25–29. https://doi.org/10.3897/jbgs.e87749

Few-Demo, A. L., & Allen, K. R. (2020). Gender, feminist, and intersectional perspectives on families: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 326–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12638

Gyan, C., & Ossom, B. L. (2026). Enduring traditions and emerging shifts: Exploring gender roles in Ghanaian marriages amidst modernization. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxaf069

Hall, S. (1990). Cultural identity and diaspora. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity: Community, culture, difference (pp. 222–237). Lawrence & Wishart.

Hornby, D., & Hull, E. (2023). Mobility, marriage decline, and the ceremonial economy: Socio-cultural factors influencing farming in South Africa and implications for land reform. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 50(7), 2539–2559. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2101098

House, D., Walker, R., Kent-Saisch, S., Emm-Collison, L., Salway, R., Porter, A., de Vocht, F., Beets, M., Jago, R., & Langford, R. (2025). The value in rapid, multi-site team ethnography for understanding context to design public health interventions: Learning from the PASSPORT study. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 24, Article 16094069251401808. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251401808

Khanal, K., & Sen, R. (2020). The dowry gift in South Asia: An institution on the intersection of market and patriarchy. Journal of Economic Issues, 54(2), 356–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2020.1743145

Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Blackwell. (Original work published 1974)

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

Massey, D. (2005). For space. Sage.

Mughal, M. A. Z. (2023). Landscape, space, and time: Navigating the cultural landscape through socio-spatial and socio-temporal organization in rural Pakistan. GeoJournal, 88(6), 6175–6187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-023-10963-x

Ocasio, W. (2023). Institutions and their social construction: A cross-level perspective. Organization Theory, 4(3), Article 26317877231194368. https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877231194368

Pratt, M. G. (2025). On the evolution of qualitative methods in organizational research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 12(1), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-111722-032953

Qiu, B., Song, P., Tao, X., Zhou, Q., & Zhang, F. (2025). Construction of urban collective memory maps based on social media data: A case study of Nanjing, China. npj Heritage Science, 13(1), Article 259. https://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-025-01806-8

Rahman, T. A., Sutjipto, V. W., & Putri, K. Y. S. (2024). The impact of exposure to online mass media on people’s attitudes in marriage decisions in Indonesia. Momentum Matrix: International Journal of Communication, Tourism, and Social Economic Trends, 1(4), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.62951/momat.v1i4.65

Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In M. Featherstone, S. Lash, & R. Robertson (Eds.), Global modernities (pp. 25–44). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250563.n2

Sacramento, O. (2025). Fruitful unpredictabilities of the field: Procedural serendipity in a multi-sited ethnography. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 54(4), 534–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912416251341461

Sinaga, R. M. (2021). The kinship commodification of local ethnic in Lampung in multicultural relations. Folklor/Edebiyat, 27(108), 1163–1183. https://doi.org/10.22559/folklor.1846

Susanti, R. (2024). Dowry practices in Lampung Pesisir traditional marriages: An Islamic legal perspective. Indonesia Private Law Review, 5(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v5i1.3185

Syahrul, N., Sunarti, S., Fatmahwati, Atisah, Yetti, E., Suryami, & Iswanto, A. (2024). Survival strategies of two changing societies’ customary consultative assemblies: The orahua of Nias and the kerapatan adaik of West Sumatra. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1), Article 2286733. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2286733

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2003). Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage. https://ich.unesco.org/en/convention

Vanke, A. (2026). Multi-sited ethnography: Developing avant-garde methodology for creative research into everyday lives. Sociological Research Online, 31(3), 397–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/13607804251345915

Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37905/jgej.v7i2.39198

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Author(s)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Sinta2                                 

aya: