Mapping Students’ Misconceptions in Chemical Bonding Using the Four-Tier Diagnostic Test

Muhamad Fadli, Napsin Palisoa

Abstract


Students’ understanding of Lewis structures and the octet rule remains a fundamental challenge in chemistry learning and is frequently characterized by conceptual difficulties. This study aims to describe the conceptual understanding profile of Chemistry Education students on Lewis structures and related sub-concepts using a Four-Tier Diagnostic Test. A descriptive quantitative research design was employed, involving 17 students from the Chemistry Education Study Program. The diagnostic instrument consisted of 15 items representing valence electrons, Lewis structures–octet rule, formal charge, resonance, octet exceptions, central atom determination, and coordinate covalent bonding.The results indicate that students’ conceptual understanding is dominated by non-scientific categories. Only 10.20% of responses demonstrate sound conceptual understanding, whereas misconceptions and lack of knowledge account for 41.57% and 48.24% of responses, respectively. These findings suggest that most students have not yet developed an adequate conceptual understanding of Lewis structures. Item-level analysis reveals pronounced conceptual weaknesses in the Lewis structures–octet rule concept, as well as a complete lack of conceptual knowledge in formal charge, resonance structure determination, odd-electron octet exceptions, and central atom determination. Furthermore, very high proportions of misconceptions (94.12%) are identified in specific diagnostic items related to resonance concepts and coordinate covalent bonding.Overall, the findings demonstrate widespread conceptual difficulties across advanced subtopics related to Lewis structures, highlighting the need for instructional strategies that emphasize conceptual change and strengthen students’ representational understanding.

Keywords


Four-Tier Diagnostic Test; Lewis Structure; Misconception; Octet Rule; Conceptual Understanding

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abd Ghani, N. S. H. (2026). Integrating Augmented Reality in Chemistry Education: The Impact of the Augmented Reality Chemistry Student Investigation (AR-CSI) Module on Content Knowledge and 21st Century Skills. Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters, 14(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.37134/jsml.vol14.1.5.2026

Ajeng, O. :, Indriana, W., & Sutrisno, H. (2018). DEVELOPMENT OF WEBSITE ENCYCLOPEDIA CHEMICAL BONDING BASED MULTIPLE REPRESENTATION FOR SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL.

Asequia, B. E. N., Alia, L. C., & Matutes, K. C. B. (2025). Development and evaluation of a re-sequenced intervention module in learning chemical bonding. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 14(6), 4864. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i6.31851

Atmaca Aksoy, A. C., & Erten, S. (2022). A FOUR-TIER DIAGNOSTIC TEST TO DETERMINE PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS’ MISCONCEPTION ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21(5), 747–761. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/22.21.747

Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Bakti, I., Rohmah, R., Yunilia Nur, P., Ni’mah, F., Rohmah, M., & Analita, R. (2025). Chemical Bonding Diagnostic Tool to Investigate Indonesian Pre-service Chemistry Teachers’ Conceptual Understanding of Chemical Bonding. The International Journal of Assessment and Evaluation, 32(2), 19–41. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-7920/CGP/v32i02/19-41

Barakat, S., & Orgill, M. (2024). Identifying the critical features of resonance: instructors’ intentions for the teaching and learning of resonance in General Chemistry I and Organic Chemistry I. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 25(2), 491–505. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RP00289F

Budi Bhakti, Y., Agustina Dwi Astuti1, I., & Prasetya, R. (2022). Four-Tier Thermodynamics Diagnostic Test (4T-TDT) to Identify Student Misconception. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i14.11958

Deng, F., Xiao, C., Jia, F., Tian, P., & Zhu, J. (2024). DEVELOPING CHEMISTRY PRESERVICE TEACHERS’ PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE (PCK) THROUGH THE LEARNING BY COLLABORATIVE DESIGN (LBCD) CURRICULUM MODEL. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 23(4), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/24.23.615

Härmälä-Braskén, A.-S., Hemmi, K., & Kurtén, B. (2020). Misconceptions in chemistry among Finnish prospective primary school teachers – a long-term study. International Journal of Science Education, 42(9), 1447–1464. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1765046

Islami, D., Suryaningsih, S., & Bahriah, E. S. (2019). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Konsep Ikatan Kimia Menggunakan Tes Four-Tier Multiple-Choice (4TMC). JRPK: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Kimia, 9(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.21009/JRPK.091.03

Istiqomah, R., & Subali, B. (2025). Literature Review: Identification of Research Trends on Misconceptions in Physics Material in 2019-2024. Indonesian Journal of Science and Education, 9(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.31002/ijose.v9i1.2484

Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(2), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00230.x

Karim, F., Ischak, N. I., Mohamad, E., & Aman, L. O. (2022). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Ikatan Kimia Menggunakan Diagnostic Test Multiple Choice Berbantuan Certainty of Response Index. Jambura Journal of Educational Chemistry, 4(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.34312/jjec.v4i1.13239

Karonen, M., Murtonen, M., Södervik, I., Manninen, M., & Salomäki, M. (2021). Heuristics Hindering the Development of Understanding of Molecular Structures in University Level Chemistry Education: The Lewis Structure as an Example. Education Sciences, 11(6), 258. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060258

Kristiana, E., Sidauruk, S., & Meiliawati, R. (2020). Kesulitan Siswa Kelas X MIA SMA Negeri Di Kota Palangka Raya Tahun Ajaran 2018/2019 Dalam Memahami Konsep Struktur Lewis Menggunakan Instrumen Two-Tier Multiple Choice. Jurnal Ilmiah Kanderang Tingang, 11(1), 200–208. https://doi.org/10.37304/jikt.v11i1.87

Mellyzar, M., & Muliaman, A. (2020). ANALISIS KESALAHAN MAHASISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL IKATAN KIMIA. Lantanida Journal, 8(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.22373/lj.v8i1.6420

Munawaroh, M., & Salirawati, D. (2025). Four-tier Diagnostic Test sebagai Pendeteksi Miskonsepsi pada Materi Ikatan Kimia untuk Mendukung Pendidikan Berkelanjutan. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains, 13(Special_issue), 176–188. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v13iSpecial_issue.88643

Musa, W. J. A., Mantuli, M. A., Tangio, J. S., & ... (2023). Identifikasi Pemahaman Konsep Tingkat Representasi Makroskopik, Mikroskopik, dan Simbolik pada Materi Ikatan Kimia. Jambura Journal of …. https://ejurnal.ung.ac.id/index.php/jjec/article/view/15201

Putri, N. S., Wasih, D. A., & Sabekti, A. W. (2024). CHALLENGES FOR LEARNING CHEMICAL BONDING MATERIALS BASED ON THE CONCEPT OF ELECTROSTATIC INTERACTION AND THE OCTET RULE. SPIN JURNAL KIMIA & PENDIDIKAN KIMIA, 6(1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.20414/spin.v6i1.9303

Rohmah, R. S., Scholichah, N., Pratiwi, Y., & Analita, N. (2022). Analysis of Students’ Chemical Bonding Misconception with A Four-Tier Diagnostic Test. JTK (Jurnal Tadris Kimiya), 7(2), 166–174.

Safitri, A. F., Widarti, H. R., & Sukarianingsih, D. (2018). Identifikasi Pemahaman Konsep Ikatan Kimia. Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia, 3, 41–50.

Stroumpouli, C., & Tsaparlis, G. (2022). Chemistry students’ conceptual difficulties and problem solving behavior in chemical kinetics, as a component of an introductory physical chemistry course. Chemistry Teacher International, 4(3), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1515/cti-2022-0005

Trio Ageng Prayitno, & Nuril Hidayati. (2022). Analysis of Students’ Misconception on General Biology Concepts Using Four-Tier Diagnostic Test (FTDT). IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v3i1.177

Vonari, I., Sidauruk, S., & Asi, N. B. (2024). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa SMADalam Memahami Konsep Ikatan Kimia (Systematic Review). Jurnal Ilmiah Kanderang Tingang, 15(2), 433–442.

Yovanie, F. (2024). Learning Chemical Bonds in Terms of Identifying Difficulties, Misconceptions, Learning Media, and Learning Models: A Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(6), 292–303. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i6.6823




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37905/jjec.v8i1.36108

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Editorial Office

Department of Chemistry, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Jl. Prof. Dr. Ing. B. J. Habibie, Moutong, Tilongkabila, Bone Bolango 96554, Gorontalo, Indonesia

E-mail: [email protected]

http://wa.me/6285341773856 (Call/sms/wa)

Jambura Journal of Educational Chemistry (p-ISSN: 2655-7606 | e-ISSN: 2656-6427) by Department of Chemistry Universitas Negeri Gorontalo. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Powered by Public Knowledge Project OJS