Epistemic Agency as a Mediator in Dual-Path Learning: Insights from Indonesian Chemistry Classrooms

Ramona Nintias R. Abas, Weny J.A. Musa, Lukman Abdul Rauf Laliyo, Masrid Pikoli, Akram La Kilo

Abstract


This study investigates the mediating role of epistemic agency in the relationship between students’ perceptions of constructivist learning environments and their conceptual understanding in Indonesian chemistry classrooms. A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design was employed, integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches. In the quantitative phase, data were collected from 712 high school students across five schools using an adapted Constructivist Learning Environment Survey (CLES) and a three-tier diagnostic chemistry test. Rasch modeling confirmed the strong psychometric properties of the adapted CLES, while structural equation modeling (SEM) revealed that epistemic agency significantly mediated the relationship between classroom environment perceptions and conceptual understanding. In the qualitative phase, thematic analysis of interviews with 12 selected students uncovered three dominant themes contributing to misconceptions: limited dialogic space, lack of contextualization, and teacher-dominated instruction. The integration of both data strands demonstrates that epistemic agency is not only influenced by pedagogical practices but also shaped by cultural norms. These findings extend the dual-path learning framework by embedding agency as a key mechanism for conceptual change. Pedagogically, the results underscore the need for dialogic, student-centered learning environments that promote active participation and reduce misconceptions. Policy-wise, the findings align with the OECD Learning Compass 2030 and Indonesia’s Merdeka Belajar curriculum, emphasizing the importance of agency-oriented strategies in achieving global education standards.

Keywords


Epistemic Agency; Constructivist Learning Environment; Rasch Analysis; Conceptual Understanding; Science Education

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Boone, W. J., & Staver, J. R. (2020). Advances in Rasch analyses in the human sciences. In Advances in Rasch analyses in the human sciences (pp. xxx–xxx). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43420-5_21

Boone, W. J., Yale, M. S., & Staver, J. R. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4

Cook, V., & Warwick, P. (2023). Realising student voice through dialogic engagement with a microblogging tool. Education 3-13, 51(1), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2021.1955947

Eriksson, I., & Lindberg, V. (2016). Enriching ‘learning activity’ with ‘epistemic practices’ – enhancing students’ epistemic agency and authority. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2016(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v2.32432

Facca, D., Gladstone, B., & Teachman, G. (2020). Working the limits of “giving voice” to children: A critical conceptual review. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920933391

Fraser, B. J. (2012). Classroom learning environments: Retrospect, context and prospect. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (Vol. 1, pp. 1191–1239). Springer.

González‐Howard, M., & McNeill, K. L. (2020). Acting with epistemic agency: Characterizing student critique during argumentation discussions. Science Education, 104(6), 953–982. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21592

Gurel, D. K., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students’ misconceptions in science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 989–1008. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a

Habiddin, & Page, E. M. (2019). Development and validation of a four-tier diagnostic instrument for chemical kinetics (FTDICK). Indonesian Journal of Chemistry, 19(3), 720–736. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.39218

Hoang, A. L., Phan, A., Dong, D. X., Tran, T. T., & Nguyen, C. T. (2023). Exploring team collective voice: The case of software development teams in Vietnam. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 26(1/2), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijotb-02-2022-0036

Inouye, K., Lee, S., & Oldac, Y. I. (2023). A systematic review of student agency in international higher education. Higher Education, 86(4), 891–911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00952-3

Johnson, B., & McClure, R. (2004). Validity and reliability of a shortened, revised version of the Constructivist Learning Environment Survey (CLES). Learning Environments Research, 7(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LERI.0000022279.89075.9f

Jusniar, J., Effendy, E., Budiasih, E., & Sutrisno, S. (2020). Developing a three-tier diagnostic instrument on chemical equilibrium (TT-DICE). Educación Química, 31(3), 84–92. https://doi.org/10.22201/fq.18708404e.2020.3.72133

Kang, N.-H. (2024). Epistemic agency as a critical mediator of physics learning. Nature Physics, 20(3), 362–366. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-024-02399-y

Kirk, M. (2025). Student voice and agency for transformative change in matters that matter: Impactful inquiry in primary science. Australian Educational Researcher, 52(1), 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-024-00721-4

Laliyo, L. A. R., Kau, M., La Kilo, J., & La Kilo, A. (2020). Kemampuan siswa memecahkan masalah hukum-hukum dasar kimia melalui pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing. AR-RAZI Jurnal Ilmiah, 8(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.29406/ar-r.v8i1.1875

Laliyo, L. A. R., Sumintono, B., La Kilo, J., & Panigoro, C. (2024). Changes in students’ socioscientific reasoning in an environmental chemistry class: Application of multi-facet Rasch model. The International Journal of Assessment and Evaluation, 32(1), 49–75.

Linacre, J. M. (2020). A user’s guide to WINSTEPS MINISTEP Rasch-model computer programs (Program Manual 4.5.1). www.winsteps.com

Liu, X., & Boone, W. J. (2023). Advances in applications of Rasch measurement in science education. Springer.

Mohammed, S. H., & Kinyó, L. (2022). The cross-cultural validation of the technology-enhanced social constructivist learning environment questionnaire in the Iraqi Kurdistan Region. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 17(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-022-00199-7

Moreira, P., & Talanquer, V. (2023). Exploring relationships that college instructors seek to build with intention in chemistry classrooms. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 25(1), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3rp00198a

Odden, T. O. B., Silvia, D. W., & Malthe‐Sørenssen, A. (2022). Using computational essays to foster disciplinary epistemic agency in undergraduate science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(5), 937–977. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21821

OECD. (2019). Student agency for 2030: OECD learning compass 2030 concept note. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/

Revill, G. (2020). Voicing the environment: Latour, Peirce and an expanded politics. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 39(1), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775820944521

Schaefer, M. B., Pennington, S. E., Divoll, K., & Tang, J. H. (2024). A systematic review of literature on student voice and agency in middle grade contexts. Education Sciences, 14(11), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111158

Setiawan, N. C. E., & Ilahi, P. R. (2022). Identification of misconceptions in chemical bonding materials using three-tier diagnostic test. Journal of Natural Science and Integration, 5(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.24014/jnsi.v5i1.16860

Tan, S. C., Wang, X., & Li, L. (2021). The development trajectory of shared epistemic agency in online collaborative learning: A study combining network analysis and sequential analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(8), 1655–1681. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211001562

Taylor, P. C., Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1997). Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 27(4), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(97)90011-2

Taylor, S. P. (2023). Students’ perceptions of their first experiences of secondary-school science in New Zealand. Learning Environments Research, 26(1), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09427-9

Treagust, D. F. (2006). Diagnostic assessment in science as a means to improving teaching, learning and retention. In Proceedings of the UniServe Science: Assessment in Science Teaching and Learning (pp. 1–9). Curtin University.

Triantafyllou, S. A. (2012). Constructivist learning environments. In Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (p. 786). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_3611

Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J., & Novak, J. D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (Vol. 3, pp. 177–210). Macmillan.

Yang, Y., Feng, X., Zhu, G., & Xie, K. (2024). Effects and mechanisms of analytics-assisted reflective assessment in fostering undergraduates’ collective epistemic agency in computer-supported collaborative inquiry. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(3), 1098–1122. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12915

Yu, Y., Yang, T., Chen, G., & Sun, C. (2024). Using learning analytics to enhance college students’ shared epistemic agency in mobile instant messaging: A new way to support deep discussion. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(3), 1166–1184. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12941

Zembylas, M. (2005). Beyond teacher cognition and teacher beliefs: The value of ethnography of emotions in teaching. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18(4), 465–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390500137642




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37905/jjec.v8i1.34366

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Editorial Office

Department of Chemistry, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Jl. Prof. Dr. Ing. B. J. Habibie, Moutong, Tilongkabila, Bone Bolango 96554, Gorontalo, Indonesia

E-mail: [email protected]

http://wa.me/6285341773856 (Call/sms/wa)

Jambura Journal of Educational Chemistry (p-ISSN: 2655-7606 | e-ISSN: 2656-6427) by Department of Chemistry Universitas Negeri Gorontalo. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Powered by Public Knowledge Project OJS